Specific Information: Marginalization and Detriment to Public Argument
(Jesse Gnehm, Willamette University)
|
1-9
|
Clash, Points and Motions: Bringing Parliamentary Procedure to Parliamentary Debate
(Michael Eaves and Carl Cates, Valdosta State University)
|
10-18
|
Judging as an Assessment of Symbolic Touch
(Jim Hanson and Matthew Johnson, Whitman College)
|
19-25
|
Parliamentary Debate: Where are we Headed?
(Skip Rutledge, Pt. Loma Nazarene University)
|
26-30
|
Reclaiming a Heritage: A Proposal for Rhetorically Grounded Academic Debate
(Michael Bartanen, Pacific Lutheran Univ. and David Frank, Univ. of Oregon)
|
31-54
|
Final Round Transcript
|
59-83
|
Final Round Decisions
|
84-94
|