| Table of Contents | Pages |
|---|---|
| Specific Information: Marginalization and Detriment to Public Argument (Jesse Gnehm, Willamette University) | 1-9 |
| Clash, Points and Motions: Bringing Parliamentary Procedure to Parliamentary Debate (Michael Eaves and Carl Cates, Valdosta State University) | 10-18 |
| Judging as an Assessment of Symbolic Touch (Jim Hanson and Matthew Johnson, Whitman College) | 19-25 |
| Parliamentary Debate: Where are we Headed? (Skip Rutledge, Pt. Loma Nazarene University) | 26-30 |
| Reclaiming a Heritage: A Proposal for Rhetorically Grounded Academic Debate (Michael Bartanen, Pacific Lutheran Univ. and David Frank, Univ. of Oregon) | 31-54 |
| Final Round Transcript | 59-83 |
| Final Round Decisions | 84-94 |
Copyright © 2020. National Parliamentary Debate Association